It is very common, among martial artists, to say:
"The weapon is an extension of the hand."
My experience says that this is true, when you look at it from a certain perspective. You already know many things from studying an empty hand art are applicable with a weapon, with adjustments for targets and ranges and whatnot.
However, once you get into the details, it becomes stunningly clear that weapons arts and empty hand arts are as dissimilar as they are similar.
|What's the empty hand version of|
nunchucks to the nads?
Defending against, and the use of, each of these weapons requires modification of your technique. Sometimes it's minor, but sometimes it's major.
This is abundantly clear when you watch primarily empty hand martial artists - and they have a lot of skill in the empty hand - fumble around with and utterly misunderstand how a weapon is used.
At a recent tournament, a high ranked black belt told our yellow belt Arnis student - who did a blade form (a competition form we created based off several anyos created by Professor Remy Presas) - that he needed "more power" in his form.
Our student performed his form with a bolo, not a stick. The interpretation of much of the form is that you are slashing opponents, so you move smoothly through strike to strike, demonstrating blade awareness throughout. Therefore, the movement is smooth and flowing, as you allow the very sharp blade to separate matter (versus blunt weapons, which require power because they inflict damage by crushing things). It does not require a lot of power to make a blade work - you're not chopping wood.
This primarily empty-hand art high-ranked black belt was not correct in this advice.
I think some of this comes from the lack of actual pressure testing of the use of weapons. For some of us, it's a safety issue, especially if you own low quality weapons that can't take a beating, like the junk they sell for XMA exhibitions performance. That stuff simply can't be used properly.
|One of these things is not like the others.|
Hint: it doesn't completely suck.
The empty hand NOT being a simple extension of the hand is abundantly clear when you are defending against a weapon.
I was training with a friend and we were doing simple knife defenses (very, very basic). The attack was a classic hammer grip, coming in an arc that would closely resemble a standard hook punch. He would block the incoming strike with a flat, open hand (as he had trained).
This is fine with an empty hand attack - even if it fails, the risk of damage is dramatically reduced by the block slowing down the attack.
However, with a blade, it's a very good idea to control the weapon by cupping, passing,or grabbing the wrist of the weapon hand. If you do not, there is literally nothing to stop me from continuing my attack through and cutting vital points - if you do not grab or pass the weapon, it is very, very easy to change the angle and deliver a critical cut.
He didn't believe me when I told him this, so we did it several times- I would attack at a faster speed, he'd open hand block, and then completely fail in stopping the weapon from cutting him in a vital area. Of course it was even worse in reverse grip, as it was very easy to cut the inside of the wrist, a strike that could be fatal within a minute or two.
You can also see very skilled empty hand martial artists make the mistake of blocking an incoming bo strike with an x-block to the weapon (yes, I have seen this done on a black belt test) or repeatedly grabbing the sharp edge of training blades, or trying to deliver high kicks when holding a long weapon, or as we've all seen, they start twirling katanas around as if they are Conan the Barbarian.
|This single scene is responsible for more bullshit than any other.|
I'd love to know what you think - feel free to tell me how full of it I am in the comments. Also, if you like what I write, can you do me a huge favor and share it on your social media channels? I'd really appreciate it, thanks!